<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Duke &#8211; Your 2010 National Champions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jfwiii.net/2010/04/06/duke-your-2010-national-champions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jfwiii.net/2010/04/06/duke-your-2010-national-champions/</link>
	<description>One person&#039;s views on sports, music, politics, religion, and technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 01:49:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Sparks</title>
		<link>http://jfwiii.net/2010/04/06/duke-your-2010-national-champions/#comment-850</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Sparks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 03:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jfwiii.net/blog/?p=1408#comment-850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, but the problem with playing Smith/Curry/Irving together is that it moves Singler back to the 4 spot, when he really seemed to work better this year as the 3 (and to whatever extent this matters, he&#039;ll obviously be a 3 in the NBA).

Then again, I don&#039;t know what the 4 and 5 spots are going to look like.  Both Plumlees?  And then.....?  So maybe Singler at 4 is the only option.

Agreed that the YALNCIF is better than the BLWTCG.  I wonder if you&#039;re referring to your expectations for the start of the Derek Dooley era.  Just remember that a Dooley-led BLWTCG is probably better than another CREEP (Coach Routinely Embarrasses Entire Program).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but the problem with playing Smith/Curry/Irving together is that it moves Singler back to the 4 spot, when he really seemed to work better this year as the 3 (and to whatever extent this matters, he&#8217;ll obviously be a 3 in the NBA).</p>
<p>Then again, I don&#8217;t know what the 4 and 5 spots are going to look like.  Both Plumlees?  And then&#8230;..?  So maybe Singler at 4 is the only option.</p>
<p>Agreed that the YALNCIF is better than the BLWTCG.  I wonder if you&#8217;re referring to your expectations for the start of the Derek Dooley era.  Just remember that a Dooley-led BLWTCG is probably better than another CREEP (Coach Routinely Embarrasses Entire Program).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wright</title>
		<link>http://jfwiii.net/2010/04/06/duke-your-2010-national-champions/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Wright]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 02:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jfwiii.net/blog/?p=1408#comment-849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s certainly going to be interesting to see how the backcourt playing time works out.  I wouldn&#039;t be surprised to see them go with a small lineup and try to work in a lot of ball pressure and force turnovers vs. trying to play half-court defense.  At least with Singler back, they&#039;ll still have some frontcourt depth.

How has YALNCIF not already caught on?  Personally, I&#039;d be happy if every year were a YALNCIF.  It sure beats a BLWTCG (Be Lucky to Win Two Conference Games).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s certainly going to be interesting to see how the backcourt playing time works out.  I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to see them go with a small lineup and try to work in a lot of ball pressure and force turnovers vs. trying to play half-court defense.  At least with Singler back, they&#8217;ll still have some frontcourt depth.</p>
<p>How has YALNCIF not already caught on?  Personally, I&#8217;d be happy if every year were a YALNCIF.  It sure beats a BLWTCG (Be Lucky to Win Two Conference Games).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Sparks</title>
		<link>http://jfwiii.net/2010/04/06/duke-your-2010-national-champions/#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Sparks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jfwiii.net/blog/?p=1408#comment-848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your readers are still here!  Well, one, at least.  I assume everyone else is still out there somewhere.

Anyway, how&#039;s Duke going to find enough playing time in the backcourt next year for Nolan Smith, Seth Curry, and Kyrie Irving?

P.S.  For you and all other 2010-11 Duke basketball fans: Welcome to your official Year Anything Less than a National Championship Is a Failure (YALNCIF, for short).  I&#039;ve been through a couple of those lately.  They&#039;re, uh, stressful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your readers are still here!  Well, one, at least.  I assume everyone else is still out there somewhere.</p>
<p>Anyway, how&#8217;s Duke going to find enough playing time in the backcourt next year for Nolan Smith, Seth Curry, and Kyrie Irving?</p>
<p>P.S.  For you and all other 2010-11 Duke basketball fans: Welcome to your official Year Anything Less than a National Championship Is a Failure (YALNCIF, for short).  I&#8217;ve been through a couple of those lately.  They&#8217;re, uh, stressful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

