Jason Heyward should not bat sixth

For some of you who still read when I occasionally blog, this headline makes perfect sense.  Lineup studies have shown that you’re better off with your best hitters getting more PAs at the top of your lineup.  Even Bobby Cox batted Heyward second for the most part last year, and it was a terrific choice.

Fredi Gonzalez, on the other hand, has chosen to put his most productive hitter in the #6 spot in the lineup, instead employing the ghost of Nate McLouth to bat second.

The issue is getting a little more traction in recent days, with the AJC’s Dave O’Brien taking a fairly neutral shot today, Craig Calcaterra pleading for a change at HardballTalk, and Dave Cameron saying it’s much ado about nothing yesterday on FanGraphs.

I couldn’t resist a comment on Cameron’s post, which essentially wondered what the big deal is when the lineup change would only net around 4 runs (half a win).  My response:

I’m hoping as a Braves fan that Fredi contributes in all those intangible ways (clubhouse management and the like), because Heyward hitting sixth is clearly the wrong decision, even if it is only worth a few runs.

Personally, I’m not shocked at the outrage, since lineup decisions are fairly easy to analyze for their impact on run scoring with the tools we have now. If we recognize it is the wrong decision, and it’s something we’ll notice day in and day out, why is it so surprising that people are mentioning it?

I’ll grant that there are probably more interesting things to talk about than the daily lineup and that Fredi is unlikely to change in spite of our efforts. I think he’s a likeable guy and is probably great at behind-the-scenes stuff.

Still, if someone comes to me and asks me for a few dollars of my paycheck every other week for no apparent reason, I’m not going to oblige just because it probably won’t keep me from making my house payment. I’m going to look at him like the fool he is and say no.

That basically sums it up.  Am I missing something, or should the goal not be to make decisions that result in the most wins?  I don’t buy the argument that it would throw the clubhouse into chaos because people aren’t batting in spots they’ve “earned.”  People need to get over their antiquated notions about “RBI guys” and lineup protection and just do what results in the most runs being scored.

The lineup is low-hanging fruit.  It is easy to change, and as the Rays have shown, it’s worthwhile to squeeze out every last bit of production you can get.  So please, Fredi, just change it.

Follow me on Twitter and join me in using the #6hitter hashtag for Heyward/lineup discussion, if that is up your alley.

The 2010 Atlanta Braves

Rooting for a sports team is a peculiar thing to do. You attach your hopes, dreams, and emotions to a group of people you’ve never met, and you root for them to succeed as though they were your own children. The whole concept of being a sports fan sounds so silly if you can take a step back and think about it that way. But there’s a reason we still do it anyway. Life itself is a competition of sorts, full of pitches and swings and wins and losses, and everyone can relate to failure and success. Sports are a fun way of doing just that, relating to one another in a way that’s fun and exhilarating and heartbreaking, often all at the same time.

Sports are undoubtedly fun when you and your team win, whether you’re a participant or spectator. The goal of the game is to win, so winning is preferable to losing in virtually every circumstance, all else equal. But as the cliche goes, winning isn’t everything. Sports are also about having a positive outlook, a belief that you can do anything if you try. Sports are about having a winning strategy and a winning mentality, knowing that if you don’t win this time, the pieces are in place for you to win the next time you compete, because you’re giving your best effort. Sports can be fun, and rooting for a team can be fun, if you know the players are genuinely trying to do their best and routinely exceeding even your loftiest expectations.

Such is the case with the 2010 version of the Atlanta Braves. There’s no doubting the fact that they lost the NLDS to a flawed San Francisco Giants team and were themselves clearly the worst of the 8 MLB playoff teams. Teams with finite resources will always have a tough time recovering after losing their two best hitters and best relief pitcher to injury, especially if they weren’t already the best team in the league.

For a while, the 2010 Atlanta Braves played exceptionally good baseball. From the end of the early-season losing streak until the day Chipper was hurt, the Braves were a great team. Not as great as some of the mid-90s teams, but still great. Unfortunately, that wasn’t the team that backed into the postseason despite losing 2 of 3 important games in the season’s final series against the Phillies.

One thing that was never in doubt about the 2010 Atlanta Braves was the character of their clubhouse. If they found a piece that didn’t fit (Yunel Escobar), it was replaced with a piece that did fit (Alex Gonzalez), no matter the cost in terms of sacrificing measurable player value. As a Braves fan, you always accepted that this would be the case with Bobby Cox at the helm. He made some maddening tactical decisions, up until the final outs of his managerial career, but Bobby Cox never lost his clubhouse or the respect of his players. You also knew that was worth something, even when the results weren’t great on the field.

The 2010 Atlanta Braves were not a great team in the end, and a better Giants team won the right to face the Phillies in the NLCS. Umpiring issues aside, it was a series of terrific games. Four one-run games, each with such a high level of drama that it’s a shame, even from an objective standpoint, that the series couldn’t have gone one more game. The Giants got hits exactly when they needed them, and they ultimately prevailed.

Just minutes before the end of Game 4, the umpiring and all other issues were not on the mind of most Braves fans at Turner Field. The same fans who, out of frustration, booed Brooks Conrad’s errors in Game 3, were on their feet cheering for him as he pinch-hit to lead off the 9th. You could almost feel the end nearing, but you could also feel the empathy for a player who was having the worst week of his professional life play out before millions of people. He had played such a key role in getting the Braves to that point, and Atlanta chose to remember the good times and hope he could work his magic just one more time. With the end nearing, the fans took the higher road. Just as the end neared for Conrad, the fans also knew that the end was at hand for Bobby Cox, and there was no one who was rooting for Brooks Conrad more than Number Six.

Aside from winning the World Series, which was never a realistic thought for this team, the best sendoff I can imagine is what actually took place. The team was scratching and clawing, drawing two walks against Brian Wilson, one of baseball’s elite relief pitchers. Conrad, Rick Ankiel, Eric Hinske, All-Star Omar Infante, and Melky Cabrera would oppose Wilson in the most important inning of the season, but I and the rest of Braves Country expected the impossible one more time. With Bobby Cox, and with these players playing specifically for him, you had to feel like the impossible was within reach.

For that reason, among others, I think this Braves team is going to stand out to me for a long time. I had the chance this year to see more games in person than ever before (7 in total), including the Jimenez no-hitter and both NLDS home games, but that’s only one reason.

This team didn’t have the talent of any of the 1991-2000 Braves teams, but everyone was tuned in to Bobby Cox and ready to work for him day in and day out. The cast was unique: Moylan, Diaz, Jones, McCann, Glaus, Wagner, Ross, Hinske, Conrad, and a host of younger players made it easy to get behind this team. With plenty of uncertainty heading into the offseason, the cast is likely to change in 2011. And even if the manager is Fredi Gonzalez, or someone else who is seemingly made in the mold of Bobby Cox, it will never be the same without the original.

So farewell, Bobby Cox. I know that putting my faith in people I don’t personally know, especially wealthy athletes and coaches, is often foolish, but I can’t help myself with your team. You’ve shown with this team, and throughout your career, what it means to understand people and get the most out of them. You’ve literally walked in the shoes of your players, putting on the uniform with cleats for 29 seasons. I’ve been watching the Braves since I was seven years old, and I won’t soon forget the impact you’ve had in your career or this final 2010 season. It’s been a pleasure to root for you and your team.

2010 Pythagorean Wins with BaseRuns

2011 update: Download here: Google Docs / Dropbox

Matthew Carruth made some excellent points in today’s Fangraphs article about using BaseRuns as a “sanity check” for a team’s performance at this point in the season.

The theory is that you can break runs scored and allowed into their components and remove some of the “noise” in projecting wins based on run scoring.  BaseRuns is probably my favorite run estimator because it ties closely to actual run scoring even in very high and very low run environments (i.e. college baseball or the MLB dead-ball era).

I wasn’t able to duplicate Matthew’s numbers exactly, so I’ll be up front about the formulas I used in case anyone wants to correct my work:

BaseRuns formula (with the “calibration” mentioned)
I used the second version (with SB/CS) for hitting and the third for pitching
Pythagorean Wins formula (with the “more accurate” 1.83 exponent)

Download the regular Excel version here.  The stats will update daily via Fangraphs, and the standings will do the same via Baseball Reference.  I didn’t make a regular Google Docs version because the web queries wouldn’t work right.

What you’ll notice on the “summary” tab is that the teams are sorted from “luckiest” to “unluckiest.”  Let me be quick to say that this is a rough estimate, so take any notions of “luck” with a grain of salt.

Based on their hitting and pitching components, though, we would say that the Rays have been the “luckiest” MLB team, and that they would finish with a record more like 100-62 (including the games they’ve already played) if they play at their current level the rest of the year.  The Orioles, perhaps unsurprisingly, are playing four games below their current BaseRuns expectation.

Braves fans may notice that the pitching staff has looked a little better from a BaseRuns perspective (83 BsR allowed, 91 actual), but good pitching can only do so much, as has been evident over the last eight days.

If you have any questions about what I did or a suggestion for how to improve it, drop me a line in the comments.

Braves Check: October 5, 2009

The Braves sure know how to finish, don’t they?  The team made it to the final week of the season in contention and decided they’d had enough drama for one season, so they packed up and went home a week early.  The end result: a six-game home losing streak to the Marlins and Nationals.  By Thursday, I had stopped watching again.

I’m going to spare everyone the stats for this week and focus instead on a few positive signs for next year:

  • The Braves had three starting pitchers finish the season with an ERA under 3 in at least 20 starts: Jurrjens, Vazquez, and Hanson.
  • Jair Jurrjens didn’t fade in the second half like he did in 2008, and he finished with the best ERA on the starting staff.  Javier Vazquez was more dominant, and it’s going to be immensely tough for him to sustain his 79.4% strand rate, but there’s no denying that he got excellent results.  His peripherals suggest he didn’t make great strides from 2008 overall, so I’d expect to see him settle back into the low-to-mid-3.00 range in 2010.  Still not bad for a 23-year-old.
  • Speaking of young pitchers, Tommy Hanson pitched well enough to deserve the Rookie of the Year award, and he looks like a present and future ace.  He finished with a better ERA (but one fewer win) than the Phillies’ J.A. Happ.  Other batting contenders like Chris Coghlan, Casey McGehee, and Garrett Jones had good seasons, but each has a pretty strong weakness in my mind.  Coghlan hit for high AVG but only middling power, while McGehee and Jones didn’t play quite as much.  None were particularly great in the field according to UZR.  I think Hanson probably finishes third in reality behind Coghlan and Happ.  It’s pretty close, but I think that would be a shame for Tommy.  He deserves it.
  • Tim Hudson and Kenshin Kawakami combined for 32 starts with good results, further demonstrating the Braves’ wealth of starting pitching talent.  Derek Lowe is the only Braves pitcher needing a big rebound year in 2010, and the Braves can afford to pull the plug on him as a starter if the other five are productive.
  • Adam LaRoche was somewhat predictably outstanding in two months after returning to Atlanta.  I have no idea why he can’t seem to produce in the first half, but he’s an elite hitter in the second half of the season.  Hopefully the Braves can afford to re-sign him; 2007 didn’t work out so well with Scott Thorman starting the year at 1B, and the Braves made a poor (in retrospect) reactionary trade for Mark Teixeira as a result.  I don’t think Freddie Freeman is ready yet (where’s the power?), and there’s no other heir apparent for LaRoche.
  • An outfield upgrade is in sight.  Nate McLouth is probably a little better than he seemed at times in 2009, although he’s not a good defensive center fielder.  Jason Heyward will hopefully make the team out of spring training and see plenty of at bats.  It’s possible he’ll platoon with Diaz, but I’d like to see him get to hit lefties as well.  Ideally, Jordan Schafer would play center field, since he’s a better defender than McLouth, but he’ll need to show signs of life at the plate.  If the Braves trade for a right-handed bat, as they’re rumored to be trying to do, some of these pieces may move in that deal.  But it will get better than the Anderson-’09 Schafer-Francoeur trio we saw for much of the year.
  • Yunel Escobar and Martin Prado were solid up the middle, at least offensively.  Escobar has a defensive reputation that isn’t really backed up by the numbers (at least not UZR); realistically, they’re both pretty close to average defenders.  Maybe I’d concede that Escobar is a bit better, especially when he’s playing hard.  Yunel was tremendously lucky at the plate with RISP in 2009 and won’t be so fortunate in the future.  Both appear to be above average hitters considering where they play on defense, and both are young enough to keep improving.
  • Brian McCann had another excellent year, although Joe Mauer clearly made strides to widen the gap between him and the rest of the field among all MLB catchers.  Still, McCann is establishing an excellent early baseline for his career, and I think he’s got a .300-30 homer season in him within the next year or two, since he’s still young enough to forecast some improved power.  I’ll also mention that David Ross had an excellent year backing him up…that was an incredibly wise signing in retrospect.

The Mets will regroup somewhat next year, although they still have a ton of question marks.  The Phillies will of course return strong to defend their division title.  The perpetually-young Marlins will be a year older.  They were very fortunate to finish second this year, but I suppose they shouldn’t be overlooked.  The Nationals, well, they’ll play next year too.

Are there any other positive signs worth mentioning for the Braves?

Braves Check: September 28, 2009

Five.  That’s the Rockies’ magic number this morning after the Braves extended their win streak to six games yesterday.  It was a good week picking on the dregs of the NL East, the Mets and Nationals.  I’m not going to dwell much on the stats this week, but I’ll consider some recent trends and get into this week’s upcoming schedule in a little more detail than usual.

Recent Trends

Martin Prado had an excellent week, so he’s getting hot at a good time.  Chipper Jones also appears to be turning things around a little bit at the plate, having hit his first September home run this week.  In general, the offense is clicking pretty well, although you wouldn’t confuse the Braves’ lineup with the Dodgers or Phillies.  Nate McLouth has gone cold in the last week or so, but for the most part, the regulars are performing pretty well.

Fortunately for the Braves, the same goes for their pitching staff.  The starting pitchers have been outstanding in September with the exception of Derek Lowe, who doesn’t seem to be right.  He’s giving up a ton of hits on balls in play, which isn’t entirely his fault, but his command is also worse than it ever was as a Dodger.

Jair Jurrjens, Tommy Hanson, and Javier Vazquez have more than made up for Lowe’s shortcomings, with Tim Hudson also contributing some quality innings since his return from the DL.  Vazquez has given up 3 runs in 32 innings over his last 4 starts.  Jurrjens hasn’t given up more than 3 runs in a start since early August, and he’s averaging 7 innings and 2 runs allowed per start since 8/7.  He’s shown no sign of tiring the way he did a year ago.

The same can’t be said for Hanson, though, who has given up 19 fly balls in his last two starts.  I would speculate that he’s been tiring and leaving the ball up in the strike zone a little too often, although I don’t really have any data to prove it.  I suspect the Braves would shut him down if they weren’t still in the race.

The Road Ahead

The Braves spend the final week of the season at home against the Marlins and Nationals.  The Marlins and Giants effectively eliminated themselves this week by not keeping up with the Braves or Rockies, although they (and the Cubs) are still mathematically alive.  I suppose it’s worth noting that the Braves are still alive in the division as well, although they’re five games back and a severe long shot in that race.

The team to focus on this week, as has been the case for a few days now, is the Colorado Rockies.  The Rockies hold a 2.5 game lead for the NL Wild Card and have an 85% chance to win according to Cool Standings.  They’ve been playing .500 ball since the Braves started their current 14-2 run on September 10th, allowing the Braves to claw from 8.5 back (and a less than 1% chance to win) at that point.

Five Colorado wins would eliminate the Braves even if Atlanta can go 7-0 this week.  Winning will be no easy task, and the current 5:1 odds against it reflect just how little time is left.

Here’s how the Rockies’ schedule looks: 3 vs. Milwaukee Tuesday-Thursday, 3 @ the Dodgers over the weekend.  Both teams will have six games remaining after the Braves and Marlins play today.  For the Rockies, Jason Marquis will get two starts, and the rest of their rotation will get one turn.  They’ll avoid both Yovani Gallardo and Chad Billingsley, but their schedule is still tougher than what the Braves will face:

Mon vsFLA: Jurrjens vs. Anibal Sanchez
Tue vsFLA: Hudson vs. Rick Vanden Hurk
Wed vsFLA: Vazquez vs. Ricky Nolasco
Thu vsWAS: Hanson vs. Garrett Mock
Fri vsWAS: Lowe vs. Livan Hernandez
Sat vsWAS: Jurrjens vs. Ross Detwiler
Sun vsWAS : Hudson vs. J.D. Martin

It’s not exactly an All-Star team of opposing starters this week, although it’s possible that Josh Johnson will start today and move Sanchez and Vanden Hurk back a day.  All seven games are at home, which is also nice.

Can the Braves keep up their current 2.5-week pace and go 6-1 this week?  If so, they only need the Rockies to play .500 or worse to tie or beat them.  Any combination of five Colorado wins or Atlanta losses would eliminate the Braves.  6-1 would be asking a lot, but I’m asking, even though it’s exciting just to see the Braves in contention again in late September.  Hopefully they’ll keep up the streak and give us some more playoff games to watch in October.

Braves Check: September 21, 2009

Seven consecutive wins weren’t good enough to scare Ryan Howard and the Phillies into prolonging the Braves’ continuing status as a contender.  The Braves finished last week with a series loss to the Phillies, leaving them 5.5 games out of a playoff spot with 13 to play.

Mathematical elimination could come as soon as this week, but it will likely wait until the weekend at the earliest.  Believe it or not, but the Braves were still technically alive on September 26, 2007 after 158 games, so they’ll need a nice run over the next week and a half to last any longer.  They do appear set for a winning season, needing only three wins to guarantee such a result.

Last Week’s Stats

Most of the regulars in the batting order had solid weeks.  Garret Anderson was the biggest exception, and his wOBA has now fallen to .313, which would make 2009 his worst season since 1996, his first full season as an Angels regular.  Nate McLouth and Yunel Escobar didn’t fare much better, especially considering the latter’s recent trip into Bobby Cox’s doghouse.  Adam LaRoche and Brian McCann had excellent weeks at the plate, as did Matt Diaz.

Javier Vazquez and Tommy Hanson had the best starts of the week, each pitching 7 shutout innings, although the latter laid an egg in his second start before the rains came on Sunday.  Jurrjens and Hudson each pitched 7 innings in their starts as well, allowing one and three runs, respectively.  Derek Lowe allowed 2 runs in 2 innings in his start.

The bullpen was up-and-down all week.  Rafael Soriano and Vladimir Nunez provided the “down,” the former allowing 4 runs in preserving a 6-0 lead against the Phillies.  Eric O’Flaherty was one of the brighter spots, giving up just one run over 5 innings in 4 appearances.

The Road Ahead

The Mets and Nationals will host the Braves for three games apiece this week.  I suppose there’s still technically a chance that they’ll stay in contention if the Rockies completely implode, but I’m not betting on it.

Braves Check: September 14, 2009

The Braves’ timing is impeccable.  They just finished the 5-1 road trip that they really needed to have 2 weeks ago to stay in the playoff race.  In reality, the Braves still need a miracle if they’re going to reach the playoffs.  They’re 6.5 games out of the wild card with three teams ahead of them and 7.5 out (3rd place) in the division.

Most Braves fans have understandably moved on to football for the year.  I might be able to say the same if the Vols hadn’t lost to UCLA as a precursor to this week’s inevitable beatdown in Gainesville.  You might say that’s given me a second wind to keep up the Braves analysis.

Last Week’s Stats

Chipper Jones continues to struggle (.188/.316/.188 this week), but at least the other purported offensive stars woke up to carry the offense.  Nate McLouth posted a .519 wOBA to bring his season mark to .361, which isn’t bad.  Hopefully he can get his legs healthy and be a solid contributor on the basepaths as well.  He didn’t attempt a steal this week despite a number of chances.

Brian McCann got back on track somewhat with a .381/.409/.524 batting line, albeit with no home runs.  Adam LaRoche and Yunel Escobar also had good weeks among the usual high-performance suspects.  Matt Diaz had a good short week; he appears to be back in a sort of part-time role with McLouth now in the lineup every day.  He’s still killing balls in play at .392, leading to a .381 wOBA that makes him look like a solid corner outfielder.

Prado, Chipper, Anderson, and Ryan Church were on the negative side of the ledger.  Prado has seen his batting line fall to .291/.342/.429, which is more in line with what we would have expected coming into the season.  He may have to beat Kelly Johnson out for the second base job again next year.

Chipper’s wOBA is down to .357, more than 50 points lower than any year since 2004, which was the first year he really started missing time for injuries.  As Chris pointed out last time, a lot of his struggles are tied to a poor BABIP, which suggests he’ll be back strong next year (at least as strong as he can be at 37).

On the mound, the Braves got excellent starts from their two young stars, Jair Jurrjens and Tommy Hanson, who now are the ERA leaders on the starting staff despite an outstanding two-start week from Javier Vazquez.  Jurrjens doesn’t seem to be tiring like he was at this point last year, in his first full big-league season, and Hanson also seems as strong as ever.  His component ratios keep improving with each start after he got off to a rough start in terms of his K/BB ratio.  Tim Hudson had a relatively poor start, although he homered, and we also got another show from the Derek Lowe Amazing High-Wire Act.

Rafael Soriano had another poor week, although his numbers look strong for the year.  The rest of the bullpen was solid, and Mike Gonzalez (despite allowing a run) now has the lowest ERA on the team.  There’s no way the Braves bring back both Gonzalez and Soriano (both will be free agents), and it’s possible they’ll let both of them go and use someone else as a closer.  As good as he’s been this year, it would be tough to rely on Soriano with his injury history, so I get the feeling he’ll probably command more money than he’s worth.

The Road Ahead

It doesn’t really matter who the Braves play any more.  After an off-day today, they’ll be at home against the Mets and Phillies with a chance to possibly affect the Phillies’ playoff seed.

Braves Check: September 8, 2009

Five straight losses, with this pitching staff?  Three against the Reds?  I suppose that’s one way to say you’re ready for the offseason.

The Braves started packing early this week and all but ended their playoff hopes.  They’re now 70-67 and in serious danger of finishing under .500 for the third time in four years.  The Phillies have lost four in a row themselves, but the Braves are at least 7.5 games back in both playoff races.

Poor offense was the culprit this week.  Wednesday’s loss at Florida was the last time they scored more than three runs, and it was also the last time a starter gave up more than three.

I’m not going into the detail on the stats this week.  With the playoffs essentially out of the picture, I’d prefer to look at the season as a whole.  This week, I’ll discuss the position players.

2009 Batting

Yunel Escobar has probably been the Braves’ most valuable position player in 2009, although it’s been a close race between Yunel and Brian McCann.  Escobar has improved throughout the year, hitting for more power since mid-July, and turning in a solid performance in the field despite battling injuries most of the year.

Regardless of Escobar’s performance this year, I still think Brian McCann is the team’s most valuable position player overall.  Escobar is almost certainly a better defender at an equally important defensive position, but McCann is a bigger power threat and a better all-around hitter.  A recent slump has pushed his average down to the .275 range, but I think his true talent is closer to .290-.300 with some walks and power.

Chipper Jones comes in a close third on the team, and he loses points for subpar defense in ’09.  Chipper’s extended slump puts his season line at .272/.394/.446, which is fine in the on-base department (though below his recent standards), but well below what we’ve come to expect in average/power.  UZR doesn’t care much for his fielding, although he’s been close to average in recent years.  Subjectively, I think he’s lost a step on both his range and reflexes.  Perhaps that has carried over to his offense as well; if so, the Braves may have seen the last of his days as an elite hitter.  I’m hoping for a resurgence in ’10, but I think it’s still going to be hard for him to stay healthy, which might accelerate his decline.

One white-hot month has made Matt Diaz the fourth-most productive Braves hitter in 2009.  His success has been driven by a high batting average on balls in play (BABIP), but he may be a player who defies conventional wisdom and can put up a .392 BABIP on a semi-regular basis.  Diaz’s 2008 season is the outlier in his recent performance, which would peg him as a legitimate .320 hitter with some power, but with very little patience.  His lack of walks and average defense drag down his overall value.

A valuable player because of his versatility, Martin Prado has been the Braves’ fifth-best position player in 2009.  He’s not the all-world hitter he seemed to be at the All-Star Break, but Prado does have the ability to hit for average, and he has enough power to be a good hitter for a second baseman.  Prado has some gap power and will take some walks, but he lacks speed and is not a terrific defender, at least in the middle infield.  As a fill-in corner infielder, his bat is solid and he defends fairly well.  I feel a lot more confident in his ability to succeed as an everyday player after this year, but as long as the Braves have Chipper Jones, they’re going to need someone else who can play second while Prado fills in at third.

Garret Anderson comes in sixth among position players primarily because he has been on the team since the start of the season.  At this point in his career, Garret has a reputation as an average hitter who isn’t going to drag down your offense, but he’s no longer a good power threat.  The problem with that theory is that he’s never walked much, and he only had plus power in his very best seasons, from 2000-2003.  He has no speed, and thus very little range defensively, so I think it’s safe to call him a below-average defender (at one of the easiest positions on the defensive spectrum).  His bat still has value because he can still turn on an NL fastball and occasionally hit one out.  He’ll catch on somewhere in 2010, but probably not for a contender unless he’s willing to be a pinch-hitter.  He’s been worth the $2.5 million the Braves spent on him, but not much more than that.

After Garret, we’re looking at part-time contributors and mid-season acquisitions.  The most significant of these was Nate McLouth, who came over from the Pirates in June.  As a Brave, he’s had a solid .345 wOBA, but he’s miscast as a Gold Glove-winning center fielder.  Unfortunately for the Braves, that award has given him a defensive reputation that outpaces reality.  McLouth has only average range despite his speed, which should be a fact that is more evident to Braves fans, who had gotten used to Andruw Jones’ Hall of Fame-level defense over the years.  McLouth does leverage his speed well on the basepaths and is one of the league’s elite runners in terms of stolen base success rate, although the Braves haven’t seen as much of that ability due to his hamstring injury.  He walks enough to be at least passable as a leadoff hitter.  He also has good power and would be a decent corner outfielder defensively.  If Jordan Schafer is deemed “ready” again in 2010, I’d say there’s a chance he does move to LF.  Otherwise, he’ll play center once again.

Adam LaRoche  has continued his odd career trend in 2009, exploding offensively in the second half of the season.  For his career, his best month in the first half of the season is June, with a .798 OPS.  His worst month after that is July, at .908.  This was a fortunate trend for Atlanta in ’09, since he came over in a deadline deal for Casey Kotchman, although I’m not sure what the plan for LaRoche is beyond this year.  The Braves still had Kotchman for a few more years, which might have given Freddie Freeman some additional time to develop power.  Now they’ll either have to rush him along or sign a stop-gap, or possibly pony up the money to sign LaRoche, who likes Atlanta but may be the best free agent 1B on the market.  At any rate, Adam has been amazing in limited ABs as a Brave, hitting .342/.420/.575, which is great even for a first baseman.

Ryan Church has given the Braves some value since coming over for Jeff Francoeur, who was an offensive black hole, and that’s putting it nicely.  Frenchy has been decent as a Met, but I’m not fooled, and you probably aren’t either.  Church has hit in the .270s for four straight years now with an OBP around .350 and moderate power.  Thankfully, the power seems to be back up to his “normal” level for the first time since last year’s bout with concussions reduced him to a virtual slap hitter.  He’s not going to hit a lot of home runs, but his 28 doubles in 341 PAs demonstrate some real gap power.  He’s an average defender on the corners and passable if he has to play center.  I think the Braves fleeced the Mets in this deal, even if Church isn’t a starter next year.  The outfield is going to get crowded with Jason Heyward’s arrival in 2010, though.

Now we’re scraping the bottom of the barrel.  The Braves got a typical Casey Kotchman season, which wasn’t enough to make them feel comfortable about their offense at first base.  Jordan Schafer was awful as the regular CF until the McLouth trade, and the Braves would have been better off if he’d let on how bad his injury was.  He’s lost a year of development now and probably needs to start 2010 in Gwinnett.  The Braves will have that luxury with McLouth manning center, although they may not choose to take advantage of it.

David Ross has been surprisingly outstanding as Brian McCann’s backup, and the Braves have him under contract for 2010, so they’ll hope he can do it for at least one more year.  Brooks Conrad has been a small-sample-size hero, although I don’t really see where he fits on the major league club going forward.  I doubt he’s inspired enough long-term confidence for the Braves to move Kelly Johnson, but I suppose that would be a possibility.  Johnson’s poor season is going to dampen his trade value, anyway.  Omar Infante has been an adequate utility player, and I would think he’ll get the chance to keep filling that role in the future.

The injuries to Escobar and Infante really hurt for a while, because that left Diory Hernandez in a starting role.  His bat looked at least a little promising coming into the year, but his glove carried a poor reputation through the minor league system.  Hernandez actually wasn’t terrible defensively, but he showed no life on offense, posting a meager .410 OPS in 93 PAs.

Greg Norton is the only other player who stayed with the team very long this year, and the Braves would probably prefer to forget his contributions.  Norton has played a total of 18 innings defensively (all at 1B), so he’s been a pinch-”hitter” almost exclusively, “hitting” to the tune of .145/.330/.174.  That’s not a bad on-base percentage, but the lack of average and power have made it abundantly clear to everyone but Bobby Cox that he doesn’t add much value with the bat anymore.  Norton does have a very low BABIP (.200), but even with average luck, we’re talking about a .240 hitter.  I’m not expecting him back for 2010.

Looking Ahead

Adam LaRoche is easily the biggest question mark for next year.  He and Garret Anderson (and Greg Norton) are free agents at the end of the season, while everyone else on offense remains under contract or team control.  The Braves won’t have much breathing room financially, especially if they pick up Tim Hudson’s option, so I would guess that a big free agent acquisition is unlikely.  The Braves might be able to afford LaRoche, but they might not.  Freddie Freeman may get some consideration if they don’t resign LaRoche, but I’m not convinced that his bat will be good enough, at least not next year.  LaRoche likes Atlanta a lot, and right now I’m hoping he’ll re-sign at a discount so that he can keep playing across the diamond from his buddy Chipper.

The situation in the infield, with the exception of first base, appears pretty solid.  Chipper will return to play third when he’s healthy, and hopefully he’ll rebound offensively.  Escobar looks great at SS, and Prado would seem to be entrenched as the 2B starter.

Questions remain for the outfield, although Nate McLouth has a pretty firm hold on one of those slots.  He’ll play center unless Jordan Schafer has an impressive spring training.  Matt Diaz and Ryan Church have similar value despite their different approaches at the plate, and they would probably form a solid left-field platoon, given their career splits.

This scenario assumes that Jason Heyward will play right field from day one in 2010.  He probably should be in Atlanta already, but the fact that he’s not means that the Braves will have some incentive to leave him in Gwinnett to start the year, so that he doesn’t become a Super Two and get an extra year of arbitration.  I don’t think the Braves can afford to take such a chance with their offense next year, though.

The Braves actually have had a league-average offense in total for 2009, but their inconsistency has them (once again) playing five games worse than their Pythagorean projection of 75-62.  Hopefully they can improve on that projection in 2010 and last longer as a contender than the first week in September.

Braves Check: August 31, 2009

I missed last week and will have to do an abbreviated version this week.  I just have too many irons in the fire right now to devote much time to blogging, and the Braves’ uninspiring play hasn’t helped.  They lost both series last week, both crippling losses given their standing in the division, but the Rockies have now lost 5 in a row, so they’re still within reach (3.5 games) of the Wild Card.

Last Two Weeks’ Stats

Matt Diaz has carried the offense for the last 2 weeks with his own extreme brand of “see the ball, hit the ball,” which works as long as he’s hitting the ball where there are no fielders.  He’s hit .471 in that time and over .500 on balls in play.  He’s also taken 3 walks and been hit by a pitch three times.  On the other side of the ledger, he’s been caught in all three of his SB attempts.  I don’t know how much longer the leadoff thing is going to work out for him, since he’s not a good on-base guy if he’s hitting any less than .330, but it seems to be working at the moment.

Still providing his trademarked late-season power surge is Adam LaRoche, who has five homers in the last 2 weeks and checks in not far behind Diaz with a .475 wOBA.  Garret Anderson and Yunel Escobar have also been quite strong, with Brian McCann doing his usual good work.

Martin Prado and Chipper Jones have been less-than-stellar, although Chipper has been more valuable than he’s seemed because he’s still drawing a ton of walks.

The Braves’ ace relief duo hasn’t allowed a run since I last checked in, totaling 11 2/3 shutout innings with just 10 baserunners allowed between them, compared to 15 strikeouts.  They’ve both stayed remarkably strong this year despite Bobby’s tendency to wear relievers into the ground.  We’ll see if they can make it through September and bounce back again next year.

The best Braves starter over the last 2 weeks has been Jair Jurrjens, who has a 2.18 ERA in 3 starts.  Everyone has been pretty good, though, with the exception of “ace” Derek Lowe, who has had a pretty rough stretch of 15 starts since mid-June (5.38 ERA).  He hasn’t been particularly unlucky on balls in play this year, either.

Minors and other notes

Jason Heyward has been sitting out with an injury for a few games, and I’ve read some discussion that they may shut him down for the season to prepare for the Arizona Fall League.  It’s looking increasingly unlikely that he will make his major-league debut this season, when you consider what Matt Diaz has been doing.

Tim Hudson is scheduled to return for Tuesday’s game against the Marlins, allowing everyone else to get an extra day’s rest.  I doubt that the Braves plan to use a six-man rotation to finish the season, but they haven’t shown their hand yet.  Sending Kawakami to the bullpen would be a defensible strategy, but it’s a risky move any way you look at it, since Hudson is still probably going to face some rough patches in the early stages of his return.  Sunday will be decision day, since that would be Kawakami’s next turn.

The Road Ahead

The upcoming series at Florida could effectively end a realistic shot at reaching the postseason for either the Braves or the Marlins.  The division rivals open the series tied at 68-62, 8 games back of the Phillies in the East.  They’re behind co-Wild-Card leaders San Francisco and Colorado by 3.5, with the latter having kept the hopes alive for both teams by losing their last five in a row.

These are the probable starters for what could be the last important week of the season if the Braves don’t win at least 4-5 games:

Mon @FLA: Kawakami vs. Josh Johnson
Tue @FLA: Hudson vs. Anibal Sanchez
Wed @FLA: Vazquez vs. Rick Vanden Hurk
Thu @FLA: Hanson vs. Ricky Nolasco
Fri vsCIN: Lowe vs. Matt Maloney
Sat vsCIN: Jurrjens vs. Bronson Arroyo
Sun vsCIN: Hudson vs. Johnny Cueto

Let’s win some games this week.

Braves Check: August 17, 2009

The two-game sweep of Washington was a nice start to the week, but it hurts to lose two of three from the Phillies.  The Braves are now in third place, six games back of the Phils for the division lead, with six games remaining against them.

The Wild Card race is getting closer, but the Braves remain 3.5 back of the Rockies in that contest.  The Giants and Marlins are also ahead of them by 2 and 1.5 games, respectively, and the Cubs are ahead of them for 4th by percentage points.

Last Week’s Stats

Five wins was not out of the realm of possibility in last week’s short set of games, but Ryan Howard claimed two games for himself on three homers.  Two mistake pitches from Javier Vazquez and one from Rafael Soriano made the difference.  On the other side of things, the Braves couldn’t seem to get the ball past the warning track when they needed hits the most.

Tommy Hanson had the week’s best start on Tuesday against the Nats, lasting 6 2/3 with one earned run allowed and 9 Ks.  Jurrjens and Lowe each lasted 1/3 of an inning longer in their starts and allowed two runs each, but Lowe generally looked worse, giving up 7 hits and 4 walks.  Kawakami allowed 3 runs in 6 1/3 innings against the Phils, and his command was a little sharper than usual, as he didn’t walk a batter.  As noted, Vazquez gave up two long balls to Howard, amounting to 4 runs in his 7 innings of otherwise solid work after the rain delay last night.

Soriano’s big fly was the anti-highlight of his one inning of work and the only sore spot on a week’s worth of great work out of the ‘pen.  Gonzalez and O’Flaherty each pitched three scoreless innings, although O’Flaherty generally looked sharper and allowed just a hit and a walk in total.  Acosta, Moylan, and Medlen combined for the other four scoreless innings of relief, rounding out the week.

Adam LaRoche and Matt Diaz were the hitting stars last week, accounting for more than a full win in positive WPA value (effectively two wins, since you start the game at .500).  LaRoche was on base 10 times in just 4 games, with 5 walks and 5 hits, including 2 homers.  Diaz also homered, but his biggest play was Brad Lidge’s failed attempt to field a bunt, costing the Phillies a win on Saturday.  Chipper, Prado, and McCann all homered and had otherwise solid weeks at the plate.

Injuries appeared to be taking a toll on the lineup this week, though.  Nate McLouth can’t seem to run yet, and Prado was suffering from dizziness on Sunday.  It wouldn’t be the end of the world if McLouth went on the DL to get some real rest for September.  Chipper appeared to have strained something after a swing on Sunday, so Omar Infante may have to step into the role that Prado had been filling for most of the year if both of those guys are hurt.  He had two hits, including Saturday’s game-winning ground ball.  McCann played in every game but looked generally fatigued, so I wouldn’t be surprised if he got today’s afternoon game off.

Garret Anderson homered, but he only reached base five times last week, including his seventh career HBP.  It’s amazing to see Chase Utley getting beaned upwards of 20 times a year, while a guy who’s been around as long as Garret has only been hit seven times.

Ryan Church and Yunel Escobar struggled through the week, but Escobar’s struggles were especially odd, given that the Braves saw four left-handed starters.  McLouth’s injuries forced Church into action when he probably would have sat against some of the lefties.

Chipper still has a comfortable lead in batting WPA at 2.48, followed by Diaz, Escobar, Prado, and now LaRoche.  Brian McCann is in the red after dropping 0.22 points this week to -0.15.  Jurrjens (2.26) took the lead from Vazquez this week on the pitching side, and Gonzalez overtook Rafael Soriano among relievers on the Howard HR.

Jason Heyward Watch

The Braves would be short an outfielder if McLouth went on the DL, but would that signal a call-up for the Braves’ top prospect?  His week wouldn’t indicate that, since he had a couple of 0-fers and saw his OPS drop to “only” 1.127.  I’m still hoping to see him soon, either in Atlanta, or in Chattanooga this coming weekend if he’s still in AA.

The Road Ahead

Rain remains in the forecast this afternoon, but hopefully they’ll get in today’s homestand finale against the D-Backs, which is itself a make-up game for an earlier rainout.  The Braves see the rest of the division on the road this week, traveling to New York and Florida for three games each.

Probable starters:

Mon vsARI: Hanson vs. Max Scherzer
Tue @NYM: Lowe vs. Oliver Perez
Wed @NYM: Jurrjens vs. Bobby Parnell
Thu @NYM: Kawakami vs. Johan Santana
Fri @FLA: Vazquez vs. Rick Vanden Hurk
Sat @FLA: Hanson vs. Chris Volstad
Sun @FLA: Lowe vs. Ricky Nolasco

The D-Backs don’t have a particularly scary lineup without Justin Upton, but Scherzer is a solid pitcher.  Hanson has been great, though, and the Braves have to expect a win today.  They should also expect to win at least 2 of 3 against the Mets, although they do draw Santana on Thursday.  The Mets will be without their four best hitters now that David Wright is on the DL.  The Braves also get to avoid Josh Johnson in the Marlins series, which is nice.

The rest of the schedule is pretty important for a team that’s teetering on the edge of contention like the Braves are, but next week will finish with another big series in Philadelphia, the Braves’ next-to-last chance to put a dent in the Phillies’ division lead.  Of course, the upcoming Marlins series is also very important since the Braves are in third place behind them, so it’s hard to look too far ahead.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 73 other followers