Rotation coming together for the Braves

It’s safe to say that there were fewer more pressing needs for the Braves this offseason than to shore up the starting rotation.  With Tim Hudson on the shelf until late 2009 and precious few others actually under team control (Jurrjens, Campillo, etc.), I was starting to view 2009 as very much a rebuilding season for Atlanta.

Trade talks heated up early this offseason involving players who will soon be more expensive, such as 2B Kelly Johnson.  The Mets were poised to remain formidable in the NL East, not to mention that the defending World Series champs also reside in the division, so I thought it was actually smart to plan not to compete in 2009 and instead build for 2010 and beyond.

The problem with that strategy was that the Braves do still have one of the best (older) hitters in the league with Chipper Jones, and until John Smoltz signed with Boston, they appeared to have the upper hand in retaining his services for another season.  If the Braves played their hand right, 2009 wouldn’t have to be a rebuilding year, per se.

Obviously, there have been some changes since October.  The Braves traded a few prospects to Chicago for Javier Vazquez, signed a decent backup catcher (a brilliant move for McCann’s long-term development, if you ask me), and participated in a lot of drama over Jake Peavy, Rafael Furcal, and Smoltz that ultimately amounted to nothing.  (For more on Smoltz, check out Luke’s post, where I chimed in a couple times in the comments.)

Entering this week, the team’s biggest offseason hole was virtually the same as in October.  The 2009 rotation appeared to be Vazquez, Jurrjens, Campillo, and whatever else the Braves could scrounge up (maybe Charlie Morton and Tom Glavine).  That’s not enough to compete in the same division as two of baseball’s best lineups, but at least Frank Wren and his staff weren’t done.

Today’s report is that the Braves have finalized their deal with 33-year-old Japanese starter Kenshin Kawakami and appear very close to a deal with 35-year-old former Dodgers’ starter Derek Lowe.  The financial terms of the Kawakami deal are somewhat uncertain, although I’ve read it’s 3 years/$24 million.  The offer to Lowe is reportedly 4 years/$60M.

These moves will drastically change the Braves’ outlook in 2009, not only because the Braves got good pitchers, but also because these pitchers appear to be somewhat durable, at least relatively speaking.

Patrick at NPB Tracker (Nippon Professional Baseball, the Japanese league) profiled Kawakami last year and projected him as a solid mid-rotation starter and the Japanese pitcher with the best current MLB prospects.   He won the Sawamura Award (the Japanese Cy Young) in 2004, but his best season came in 2006.  This signing is pretty much unprecedented for the Braves, and it will be interesting to see how a Japanese player works out in the Atlanta market.

Derek Lowe is a little easier to project.  He’s averaged over 200 innings since 2002 and settled into the mid-threes in ERA since his introduction to the NL in 2005.  Granted, Dodger Stadium is a pitcher’s park, but he still projects to have several good years left in Turner Field, even at age 35.  4 years and $60 million is pretty much right on the nose for what his value was perceived to be entering the offseason.

So now the rotation looks like this: Lowe, Vazquez, Kawakami, Jurrjens, Campillo.  The Braves could entertain a number of other options if Campillo is ineffective or if Jurrjens suffers a slump after being overworked in 2008.  Charlie Morton and Jo-Jo Reyes will bide their time at Gwinnett, possibly as teammates of the Braves’ top pitching prospect, Tommy Hanson.  The pressure will also be off Tim Hudson to return to form later this year, which would have been an unrealistic expectation.

Perhaps there will be reason to cheer in 2009 for me and my fellow Braves fans?

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Rotation coming together for the Braves

  1. The rotation does look to be in pretty good shape. I’m not a huge fan of Lowe, but he was the best available with Sabathia and Burnett going to New York and Jake Peavy apparently deciding to do nothing.

    I’m excited about Kawakami. He’s a complete unknown to me, but that’s part of the excitement.

    I like Jurrjens a lot, though I’m concerned about a sophomore slump. Hopefully getting to move down in the rotation will help him out.

    What’s the status on Peter Moylan? I thought that we were supposed to get him back sometime during the season, but didn’t know when. And what about Gonzalez and Soriano? Are those guys finally healthy?
    Hopefully, we have pitchers this year who can eat innings, which should allow our bullpen to be more effective (assuming they can keep off the DL).

    All that being said, I don’t really see us contending as long as we have an outfield that might collectively produce 20 home runs.

  2. I’d rather have Lowe for 4 years/60 mil than Burnett for 5 years/ 82 mil. Makes me kind of thankful Burnett chose the pinstripes.

    I’m still not convinced that this squad is good enough to get back to the postseason, although I’d love to be proven wrong.

    The rotation isn’t as top heavy as many dominant rotation are (but not every rotation can have a Johan Santana or a Cole Hamels) but it has somewhat made up for it in depth. Hey, weren’t we using that “depth” word to describe our rotation at the beginning of last season?

    More importantly, as has been pointed out, we are going to need more firepower than Chipper, McCann and Kelly Johnson’s good half.

  3. Burnett gave me the willies at his asking price, although he’s certainly a better pitcher than Lowe when healthy. Peavy would have been nice (and seemed like a possibility for a while), but it looks like Sabathia wasn’t considering the Braves.

    I’m with Tim and JC, who seem to think Lowe was one of the better values all along.

    You guys are right about the lineup. I’ll have to do a little digging, but I’ve read that the Braves are on the list of suitors for Adam Dunn (who is probably asking too much) and that they have talked to the Yankees about Xavier Nady and/or Nick Swisher.

    I’d feel a little better about the outfield if Jason Heyward were at the same point in his development as Tommy Hanson appears to be. I’d say 2010 is the ETA for him, and the Braves need someone now if they’re going to hit enough in 2009. Pat Burrell would have been nice. He was an amazing bargain for the Rays, although he’s a better fit there because they have the ability to DH him every now and then. Not sure there’s anyone else like that out there.

  4. Luke,

    To answer your questions about the bullpen (sort of), the best info I found is that Moylan may be aiming to return for opening day. The general rule is that Tommy John patients take 18 months to return to their previous form, even though they can usually get back on the mound within a year. That would knock out 2009 for Moylan, but I think he’s in good shape if the other relievers stay relatively healthy. I can still see him being an effective #3 reliever as he continues to build strength.

    As for Soriano and Gonzalez, Gonzalez looks like the more reliable of the two from a durability standpoint. Soriano had some “minor” surgery in August and is expected to return for Opening Day, while Gonzalez is reportedly healthy. Personally, I wouldn’t plan on having more than one of them around at a given time, but maybe that’s too pessimistic.

    The Braves usually fill out their bullpen relatively well, especially when it comes to previously unknown players, so I imagine they’ll do more of the same this year. Things look relatively stable for now.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s